Progress in photovoltaic rudorffites: perspectives of silver iodobismuthates for next generation photovoltaics
Ivan Turkevych a
a National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Higashi, Ibaraki, Japan
Proceedings of International Conference on Advanced Light Absorbing Materials for Next Generation Photovoltaics (ABSOGEN)
Online, Spain, 2020 November 17th - 18th
Organizers: Hongxia Wang, Xiaojing Hao and Lydia Wong
Oral, Ivan Turkevych, presentation 001
Publication date: 6th November 2020

Perovskite photovoltaics (PV) is becoming a competitive technology to CIGS, CdTe and crystalline Si solar cells, especially after addressing its key issues, such as hysteresis [1], stability [2], and scalability [3]. However, the issue of Pb toxicity still remains an obstacle that can hinder potential of perovskite PV. According to the WHO, the blood Pb level for children should not exceed 5 mg/L, which is the amount of Pb contained in only 5x5 mm2 of a perovskite absorber layer. Although, Pb-based perovskite PV does not lose its advantages for solar power stations located in non-residential areas, the neurotoxicity of Pb should be considered extremely seriously in the case of building integrated perovskite PV systems. For that reason, the development of non-toxic Pb-free halide semiconductors for photovoltaic applications is highly desirable.

In my presentation I am going to review recent progress in Bi-based photovoltaic rudorffites. In contrast to double-perovskites C2ABX6 (C=Cs, MA; A=Ag, Cu; B=Bi, Sb; X=Br, I) consisting of corner shared AX6 and BX6 octahedra and hybrid C3B2X9 halides, such as MA3Bi2I9, consisting of isolated face-shared B2X9 bioctahedra, the family of rudorffite materials with a general formula of AaBbXx (A=Ag, Cu; B=Bi, Sb; X=Br, I, and x=a+3b) has a structural motif based on edge-shared AX6 and BX6. Several members of this family, such as Ag3BiI6, Ag2BiI5, AgBiI4, AgBi2I7, have been extensively studied for solar cell applications during the last three years [4,5]. This family of materials was named rudorffites, after Walter von Rudorff, who discovered their prototype oxide NaVO2. Rudorffites feature direct bandgaps in the range of 1.76-1.83 eV corresponding to possible PCE of up to 18% by assuming Voc of 1.2V, typical optical losses and FF for optimized solar cells. It turns out, however, that rudorffite solar cells do not follow the rapid PCE improvement trend that we observed for Pb-based hybrid perovskites. In contrast to electronically clean hybrid perovskites, where native point defects usually do not create mid-gap levels acting as recombination centers, the control of electronically active point defects in rudorffite absorbers is highly important issue as it is in the case of GIGS and CZTS. I am also going to highlight my recent achievements in fabrication of morphologically perfect rudorffite layers through iodination of Ag-Bi bimetallic films and discuss further technological improvements that can help to reveal full potential of rudorffite solar cells.

© FUNDACIO DE LA COMUNITAT VALENCIANA SCITO
We use our own and third party cookies for analysing and measuring usage of our website to improve our services. If you continue browsing, we consider accepting its use. You can check our Cookies Policy in which you will also find how to configure your web browser for the use of cookies. More info