Stability of Perovskite Solar Cells: the use of different stress conditions to identify degradation pathways
Ahmed Salem a e, Herbert Lifka a e, Santhosh Shanmugam a e, Francesco Di Giacomo a e, Alessia Senes a e, Ronn Andriessen a e, Mehrdad Najafi b e, Sjoerd Veenstra b e, Klaas Bakker b e, Tamara Merckx c e, Joao Bastos c e, Olivier Bellon d e
a Holst Centre, Solliance, NL, High Tech Campus, 21, Eindhoven, Netherlands
b ECN, High Tech Campus 21, Eindhoven, 5656, Netherlands
c IMEC, Belgium, Kapeldreef, 75, Leuven, Belgium
d Dyesol, 3 Dominion Place, Queanbeyan, 2620, Queanbeyan East, Australia
e Solliance, High Tech Campus 21, Eindhoven, 5656AE, Netherlands
Proceedings of Perovskite Thin Film Photovoltaics (ABXPV17)
València, Spain, 2017 March 1st - 2nd
Organizers: Henk Bolink and David Cahen
Oral, Alessia Senes, presentation 034
Publication date: 18th December 2016

The performance of perovskite solar cells are continuously increasing, recently reaching efficiencies of over 20%. However, the stability of these devices is not as impressive as their efficiency: more comprehensive studies on degradation mechanisms, and a deeper understanding of the weak spots of the different available stacks are necessary to bring perovskite solar cells to the next level.

We studied the stability of perovskite solar cells for two different structures: N-I-P (glass/ITO/TiO­2/Perovskite/Spiro-OMeTAD, Au/barrier) and - P-I-N (glass/ITO/NiO:Cu/Perovskite/PCBM/ZnO/Al/barrier). In several parallel experiments, we stressed both structures with light or with temperature, and we compared the results with devices under shelf-life conditions. We found that for both architectures, the main stress factor was light. Looking at the whole set of experiments, we observed different degradation pathways for P-I-N and N-I-P structures. For P-I-N devices we found the Aluminum contact as the main degradation factor, while for the N-I-P devices there are strong indications that the photocatalytic property of the TiO2 layer is the major cause of fast degradation. A second set of devices was stressed in dark, at temperatures increasing from 45 °C to 100°C: for P-I-N and N-I-P devices we observed that the deviation between shelf life and temperature induced degradation happened at different temperatures. The P-I-N devices, compared with the N-I-P devices, shown higher stability.

These experiments helped us to identify the weak spots in our devices. Moreover, we gained a better comprehension of the degradation factors for our devices: this helps us to choose the best ageing conditions for accelerated lifetime tests, allowing a faster screening of new stacks and helping us to focus our work on the most promising stacks. The understanding of degradation pathways will also help up define encapsulation requirements and specifications. 

We use our own and third party cookies for analysing and measuring usage of our website to improve our services. If you continue browsing, we consider accepting its use. You can check our Cookies Policy in which you will also find how to configure your web browser for the use of cookies. More info