Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Hybrid and Organic Photovoltaics (HOPV14)
Publication date: 1st March 2014
The development of photovoltaic devices based on organic materials has been at the centre of increasing worldwide efforts in the last years. The motivation for such interest derives from the envisaged prospect of manufacturing light weight, flexible and inexpensive cells. In the quest for higher efficiency, different approaches have been adopted, including the chemical synthesis of low molecular weight or polymeric compounds with tailored properties (frontier orbitals energy, light absorption, charge mobility, etc.) and the optimization of the morphology in phase separated heterojunctions. In addition, in some of the most interesting approaches, the surfaces between the active layer and the electrodes were targeted. The interest in such surfaces arises from the fact that they are the site where several phenomena relevant for the overall device efficiency take place. In spite of the still poor understanding and modellization of such phenomena, efficiency has been improved by inserting “buffer” layers of different thickness and chemical nature, including semiconducting polymers and metal oxides.
We report on the effect on the overall efficiency of a simple surface treatment: rubbing. The sytem taken as a model is the well studied Bulk Heterojunction ITO/PEDOT: PSS/P3HT-PCBM/Al, where the PEDOT:PSS was rubbed with a velvet cloth before the deposition of the BHJ by spin-coating. When the rubbing is neither excessive nor too light, both the short circuit current and the fill factor increase, while the open circuit voltage is constant, as illustrated in the figure, where the number next to the symbols indicates the number of times the PEDOT:PSS surface passed under a rotating cylinder covered with the velvet cloth. Although reproducibility is poor, due to the difficulty in standardizing the rubbing protocol, the efficiency of the rubbed cells increases by an average of 20 % when compared to the non-rubbed controls, and up to 30 % in the best cases. Such observations have been explained in terms of the surface roughness and charging induced by rubbing. The importance of such results lies in the fact that rubbing is ideally suited for roll-to-roll processes.