Statistical methods in the analysis of dye solar cell experiments
Armi Tiihonen a, Kati Miettunen a, Janne Halme a, Peter Lund a, Reko Leino b, Denys Mavrynsky b, Sabine Rendon b
a Department of Applied Physics, Aalto University, P.O.Box 15100, Espoo, FI-00076 AALTO, Finland
b Åbo Akademi University, Finland, Porthaninkatu, 3, Turku, Finland
International Conference on Hybrid and Organic Photovoltaics
Proceedings of International Conference on Hybrid and Organic Photovoltaics 2015 (HOPV15)
Roma, Italy, 2015 May 11th - 13th
Organizer: Filippo De Angelis
Oral, Armi Tiihonen, presentation 052
Publication date: 5th February 2015
How do you know that your new magic material really improves the performance of your solar cells, when there is so much variance in the results from sample to sample? How do you decide that one solar cell in your experiment is an outlier that should be dropped off from the analysis? Is all hope lost, when you complete a 1000 h long light soaking aging test only to find out that your samples were exposed to somewhat different light intensities depending on their position under the lamps, causing so large scattering in the data that it seems impossible to draw any meaningful conclusions? These and many other questions can be answered using statistical methods that, nevertheless, are hardly ever used in the scientific papers published in our field, for which there can be many reasons. The biggest reason could be that statistical methods are perceived as hard to understand, difficult to use, and ineffective or even questionable when the measured series consist of only a few solar cells. It does not have to be that way. In this contribution, we use real experimental cases to present how simple statistical methods can be applied to typical experiment data gathered in the dye solar cell research, and show how they not only facilitate drawing more robust, objective conclusions from the results, but also help the researcher in her practical work. Although most statistical methods work better the larger the sample size, they are applicable and useful also for series with less than ten cells in each group. The presented methods are Peirce’s criterion, t-test, analysis of variance, and analysis of covariance [1,2]. Peirce’s criterion is a method for detecting outliers from a data set. T-test and analysis of variance are useful for drawing statistically significant conclusions from the comparison of two or more groups of cells. The analysis of covariance allows separating the effect of nuisance factors such as varying light intensity from the aging behavior of each cell group, making it possible to determine more reliably whether or not the groups aged differently. Statistical methods offer an objective way to assess and report the reliability of the results. They belong to the basic toolbox of every experimentalist. When we know which methods to use and when, and practice a little, they can become a routine that serves us and our readers well.

[1] Montgomery, D. Design and analysis of experiments. John Wiley & Sons 2008. [2] Ross, S. Peirce's criterion for the elimination of suspect experimental data. Journal of Engineering Technology 2003, 2, 38 - 41.
© FUNDACIO DE LA COMUNITAT VALENCIANA SCITO
We use our own and third party cookies for analysing and measuring usage of our website to improve our services. If you continue browsing, we consider accepting its use. You can check our Cookies Policy in which you will also find how to configure your web browser for the use of cookies. More info