Publication date: 11th March 2026
While perovskite solar cells (PSC) have reached efficiencies near the practical limit, sustaining high energy yields through long-term operation remains challenging. For thin-film PSCs, evaporated Au electrodes are commonly used as the most stable metallic contact. Au is, however, unsuitable for industrial applications because of its high cost. Devices with cheaper metals are often observed to lead to unstable PSCs. To overcome this challenge, we assess the impact of a 5 nm chrome (Cr) interlayer, often used in semiconductor devices to inhibit metal interdiffusion, beneath Cu, Ag and Al electrodes. We find comparable stability for devices with Cr/Al electrodes and Au-based devices, while being 100,000 times more cost-effective in terms of raw materials price. On the opposite side of the PSC, transparent conducting oxides (TCOs) are usually used as the “window” electrode. We reveal a large difference in stability between indium tin oxide (ITO) and fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) electrodes, with FTO-based PSCs being more stable across different temperatures under simulated solar irradiance. We show that significant amounts of In³⁺ ions throughout the perovskite layers are deleterious to stability. Combining the most stable electrodes, devices on FTO substrates with Cr/Al bilayers, were stable across laboratories, with champion devices retaining over 66% of their initial efficiency after 1037 hours at 75 °C under simulated sunlight. Our findings highlight the importance of substrate and electrode selection for durable, scalable perovskite solar cells and offer a sustainable solution. This also has broader implications for stable and cost-effective electrode materials for other optoelectronic devices composed of perovskites and other PV technologies.
