Role of Ink Solvents in Determining GeOx Passivation vs. Sn–Ge (1:1) Alloyed Perovskite Solar Cells
Shuzi Hayase a
a The University of Electro-Communications, 1-5-1 Chofugaoka, Chofu, Tokyo 182-8585, Tokyo, Japan
Invited Speaker, Shuzi Hayase, presentation 016
Publication date: 22nd October 2026

This study focuses on the relationship between a GeI2 additive and DMSO-based ink. Previously, we reported that incorporating a small amount of GeI2 into precursor inks for both Pb- and Sn-based perovskites significantly improved device efficiency and thermal stability(1-3). These enhancements were attributed to surface passivation by GeOx, which is formed via the oxidation of GeI2 by DMSO and diffuses to the interfaces during crystallization(4). Adding GeI2 to a DMSO-free ink reduced solar cell efficiency, indicating that a DMSO-based ink is essential for the GeI2 additive to function effectively. However, devices fabricated from DMSO-based inks exhibited lower long-term stability than those prepared from DMSO-free inks. To combine the advantages of DMSO-free processing and GeOx-derived passivation, we introduced a vacuum-deposited GeOx layer between the HTL and a GeI2-undoped Sn-based perovskite layer. The inserted GeOx layer effectively acts as a passivation layer(5). Perovskite/perovskite tandem solar cells passivated with GeOx are reported. Furthermore, Ge–Sn (1:1) alloyed perovskite solar cells were successfully prepared via spin-coating using a DMSO-free solvent(6). Our findings demonstrate that solvent selection is a critical factor in fabricating both GeOx-passivated and Sn–Ge alloyed perovskite solar cells.

© FUNDACIO DE LA COMUNITAT VALENCIANA SCITO
We use our own and third party cookies for analysing and measuring usage of our website to improve our services. If you continue browsing, we consider accepting its use. You can check our Cookies Policy in which you will also find how to configure your web browser for the use of cookies. More info