Photoelectrochemical H2 production: Lessons from field tests
Anna Hankin a, Andreas Kafizas b, George Creasey a, Arend Moelich c, Craig McGregor c, Thomas Shalvey e, Alex Cowan d, Dora Alicia Garcia-Osorio d, Jon Major e
a Department of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
b Department of Chemistry, Molecular Sciences Research Hub, Imperial College London, London, W12 0BZ, UK
c Department of Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering, Joubert Street, Stellenbosch, 7602, South Africa
d Department of Chemistry, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7ZD, United Kingdom
e Department of Physics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7ZE, United Kingdom
Proceedings of MATSUS Fall 2025 Conference (MATSUSFall25)
E.22 Photoelectrochemical approaches for added-value chemicals and waste valorization - #PecVal
València, Spain, 2025 October 20th - 24th
Organizers: Salvador Eslava, Sixto Gimenez Julia and Ana Gutiérrez Blanco
Invited Speaker, Anna Hankin, presentation 277
Publication date: 17th July 2025

We have designed, built and characterized a prototype photoelectrochemical demonstration system capable of splitting water into hydrogen and oxygen using only photon energies. The reactor was operated during Mar-May 2024 at Stellenbosch University (33.93° S, 18.86° E), while mounted on a 2-axis tracking platform. Light was directed laterally both into the (photo)cathode and photoanode compartments, which were separated by an ion-permeable membrane. Double-sided irradiation was achieved by two methods that were compared with each other: (i) using mirrors (Ag-coated mirror for the (photo)cathode side and Al-coated mirror for the photoanode side) and (ii) linear Fresnel lenses coupled with stepped Al waveguides. The latter irradiation method delivered light, concentrated by a factor of up to 4, though theoretical simulations show that through design improvement the concentration factor could ultimately reach ≈ 15.

The reactor was operated in two modes:

(a) Photoelectrochemical (PEC), utilising an FTO|WO3|BiVO4|NiFeOx photoanode and a FTO|Au|Sb2Se3|CdS|TiO2|Pt photocathode[1,2];

(b) PV-assisted photoelectrochemical (PV-PEC), utilizing the same FTO|WO3|BiVO4|NiFeOx photoanode, Ni cathode and an externally mounted c-Si PV.

In mode (a), a pH gradient was employed to assist water splitting, with a pH ≈ 0.8 aqueous catholyte comprising 0.1 M H2SO4 and anolyte comprising 1 M H3BO3 + 1 M NaOH at pH ≈ 9.3. In mode II, both electrolytes were 1 M H3BO3 + 1 M NaOH. A cation-permeable membrane, NafionTM 115, was utilized in all experiments. The reactor was operated in batch recycle mode. The areas of the (photo)electrodes and the PV were all 30 cm2.

We observed that our bismuth vanadate (BVO) photoanodes usually degraded within hours, for which we propose two reasons. Firstly, when coupled with c-Si PV, the potential of the photoanodes was observed to increase into the dark current regions under low irradiance. While the c-Si PV is able to generate a significant photocurrent even on cloudy days, the bismuth vanadate photoanode is unable to match this through its own electron-hole generation. When anode potentials exceeded ≈1.1 V (RHE), the photoanode is thought to have degraded through oxidation of the bismuth; the degradation was irreversible. Secondly, the photoanodes degraded equally quickly under concentrated irradiance; we are currently investigating whether this was caused by overheating, high flux of bubbles or both. It is currently unclear whether the issue is with the adhesion of the WO3 layer to FTO or due to the bismuth film itself, but this is under active investigation and we have partially aleviated the adhesion issue by introducing a planar WO3 seed layer between the FTO and the WO3 nanoneedles.

I shall discuss the experimental results from reactor testing, the performance under various modes of irradiation, and the effects of electrode materials, geometries and relative configurations within the  reactor on its design, overall performance and further scale-up, as well as the future role of photoelectrochemical systems in energy storage.

G. C. thanks the Department of Chemical Engineering at Imperial College London for an EPSRC DTP PhD scholarship (EP/W524323/1). A. K. thanks the Grantham Institute for Climate Change and the Environment for a pump-priming grant and the EPSRC for a Programme Grant (EP/W017075/1). A. H. thanks the Department of Chemical Engineering for the lectureship start-up grant and EPSRC (EP/W033216/1) for funding the PDRA position of J. R. A.

© FUNDACIO DE LA COMUNITAT VALENCIANA SCITO
We use our own and third party cookies for analysing and measuring usage of our website to improve our services. If you continue browsing, we consider accepting its use. You can check our Cookies Policy in which you will also find how to configure your web browser for the use of cookies. More info