Charge carrier separation in the BiVO4/WO3 heterojunction
Shababa Selim a, Laia Francas a, Andreas Kafizas a, James Durrant a
a Department of Chemistry, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus London, London, United Kingdom
Materials for Sustainable Development Conference (MATSUS)
Proceedings of nanoGe September Meeting 2017 (NFM17)
SF1: Material and Device Innovations for the Practical Implementation of Solar Fuels (SolarFuel17)
Barcelona, Spain, 2017 September 4th - 9th
Organizers: Wilson Smith and Ki Tae Nam
Poster, Shababa Selim, 170
Publication date: 20th June 2016

Extending the lifetime of photogenerated charges, to do useful work such as reduction and oxidation reactions involved in the solar water splitting process, has been a longstanding challenge. Long charge carrier lifetimes are desired to compensate for the slow kinetic nature of this process, however, photogenerated charges are susceptible to recombination unless they can be spatially separated.1–3 This can be achieved by coupling n-type semiconductors with appropriate conduction and valence band positions, providing a thermodynamic driving force for charge separation. BiVO4 and WO3 are attractive candidates for these systems due to their complementary properties of light harvesting, appreciable band gap, and high quantum efficiencies of light conversion to oxidise water with moderate applied bias, at ultra-bandgap wavelengths. 4,5 Although the heterojunction demonstrates enhanced performance, the exact nature of the charge transfer across the materials remains elusive.6,7 The effect of charge separation on charge lifetimes, and the bias dependence of this process has been probed using transient absorption spectroscopy and transient photocurrent measurements, revealing sub-μs electron transfer to WO3. Charge separation is shown to significantly extend hole carrier lifetimes in the μs-s timescale, thus explaining the photocurrent enhancement in the heterojunction configuration.

 

References

1         A. J. Cowan, W. Leng, P. R. F. Barnes, D. R. Klug and J. R. Durrant, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2013, 15.

2         M. Barroso, S. R. Pendlebury, A. J. Cowan and J. R. Durrant, Chem. Sci., 2013, 4, 2724.

3         Y. Ma, S. R. Pendlebury, A. Reynal, F. Le Formal and J. R. Durrant, Chem. Sci., 2014, 5, 2964–2973.

4         Y. Pihosh, I. Turkevych, K. Mawatari, J. Uemura, Y. Kazoe, S. Kosar, K. Makita, T. Sugaya, T. Matsui, D. Fujita, M. Tosa, M. Kondo and T. Kitamori, Sci. Rep., 2015, 5, 11141.

5         M. G. Lee, D. H. Kim, W. Sohn, C. W. Moon, H. Park, S. Lee and H. W. Jang, Nano Energy, 2016, 28, 250–260.

6         S. J. Hong, S. Lee, J. S. Jang and J. S. Lee, Energy Environ. Sci., 2011, 4, 1781.

7         X. Shi, I. Herraiz-Cardona, L. Bertoluzzi, P. Lopez-Varo, J. Bisquert, J. H. Park and S. Gimenez, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2016, 18, 9255–9261.

© FUNDACIO DE LA COMUNITAT VALENCIANA SCITO
We use our own and third party cookies for analysing and measuring usage of our website to improve our services. If you continue browsing, we consider accepting its use. You can check our Cookies Policy in which you will also find how to configure your web browser for the use of cookies. More info