A Nanomorphology Taxonomy for Organic Solar Cells Modeling
Alexis Prel a, Abir Rezgui a, Anne-Sophie Cordan a, Yann Leroy a
a Laboratoire ICube, Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, UMR 7357, 23 rue du Loess, 67037 Strasbourg, France
Materials for Sustainable Development Conference (MATSUS)
Proceedings of nanoGe Fall Meeting19 (NFM19)
#OPV19. Organic Photovoltaics: recent breakthroughs, advanced characterization and modelling
Berlin, Germany, 2019 November 3rd - 8th
Organizers: Jörg Ackermann and Uli Würfel
Oral, Alexis Prel, presentation 164
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29363/nanoge.nfm.2019.164
Publication date: 18th July 2019

Nanoscale morphology is an essential feature of bulk-heterojunction organic solar cells. In the past, disordered geometries have helped to push efficiencies beyond what early bilayer strategies could achieve, by providing a compromise between interface processes and transport along percolation pathways. [1]  It is therefore desirable to acquire a fundamental understanding of the relationship between the heterojunction's nanoscale morphology and the transport of exciton or free carriers in these devices.

In this context, I use numerical simulations to investigate the influence on transport of various morphologic traits such as the tortuosity of the conduction pathways, the presence of dead-ends or the fraction of disconnected domains. In this contribution, I show how much can be learned from applying drift-diffusion models to a few representative test cases. I argue that these can form a basis for a better understanding of structure-property relationships in organic solar cells, as depicted in the attached figure. For instance, in open-circuit conditions, the surface-to-volume ratio of the conduction pathways is a sufficient geometrical descriptor, whereas a quantitative definition of tortuosity is needed to describe short-circuit conditions. In the future, a strong knowledge of these basic cases could provide the missing link between extensive morphology information (e.g. as obtained by electron microscopy or X-ray diffraction) and interpretation in terms of transport and device performances.

This is embedded in a parameter extraction procedure to quantitatively interpret characterization data, and infer morphologic information. To this end, I use a Bayesian framework [2] to aggregate information from multiple techniques. This makes the inference more robust [3], and takes the algorithm presented in reference [4] one step further. I demonstrate with simple examples why this should be done routinely to avoid dramatic interpretation errors.

Possible applications include the use of non-destructive techniques on fully grown devices (e.g. I-V curve, TPC, TPV, CELIV, …) as a way to compare active layer depositions or identify degradation mechanisms.

© FUNDACIO DE LA COMUNITAT VALENCIANA SCITO
We use our own and third party cookies for analysing and measuring usage of our website to improve our services. If you continue browsing, we consider accepting its use. You can check our Cookies Policy in which you will also find how to configure your web browser for the use of cookies. More info