Consistent Description of the Electron and Hole Mobilities in Organic Solar Cells
Tanvi Upreti a, Yuming Wang a, Huotian Zhang a, Feng Gao a, Martijn Kemerink a
a Linköping University, Sweden, SE-581 83, Linköping, Sweden
Materials for Sustainable Development Conference (MATSUS)
Proceedings of nanoGe Fall Meeting19 (NFM19)
#OPV19. Organic Photovoltaics: recent breakthroughs, advanced characterization and modelling
Berlin, Germany, 2019 November 3rd - 8th
Organizers: Jörg Ackermann and Uli Würfel
Oral, Tanvi Upreti, presentation 136
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29363/nanoge.nfm.2019.136
Publication date: 18th July 2019

Recent years have seen a considerable development in the field of organic solar cells with efficiencies exceeding 16%. The charge transport in the active layer is generally understood to occur by a hopping mechanism for which many models have been proposed. From an application perspective, the extended Gaussian disorder model (eGDM) [1], which assumes nearest neighbor hopping (nnH) in a Gaussian density of states, has by far been most successful, and typically works well for p-type materials. We find it gives an inconsistent description for typical electron-only devices, significantly underestimating disorder.

Here we propose a more physical analytical variable range hopping (VRH) model which allows a consistent extraction of the hopping parameters from quasi steady state experiments, in particular T-dependent SCLC. The model has been calibrated by direct comparison to kinetic Monte Carlo simulations. It is tested for various material combinations, ranging from the highly studied TQ1: PCBM system (PCE » 6%) to high-performance non-fullerene binary and ternary systems such as PM6:Y6 (PCE » 16%). While for some materials a nnH model can still be applied, the major advantage of our model is that it provides a consistent description of all investigated material systems and can predict if nnH could be used alternatively. The TOC image below shows the Electron-only temperature dependent SCLC data (symbols) for TQ1:PCBM fitted using EGDM (blue dashes) and VRH model (red solid). The electron disorder as previously extracted from transients is 120 meV [2], VRH and nnH models give 119.68 meV and 100.4 meV, respectively.

We find that the main difference between p- and n-type transport lies in the significantly larger localization radius of the latter, while all other parameters (disorder, attempt rates etc.) are comparable for holes and electrons

© FUNDACIO DE LA COMUNITAT VALENCIANA SCITO
We use our own and third party cookies for analysing and measuring usage of our website to improve our services. If you continue browsing, we consider accepting its use. You can check our Cookies Policy in which you will also find how to configure your web browser for the use of cookies. More info